Of course, I would like to say something like: Sure my writings will make difference, enhance humanity and bring about a Utopia where everyone would be happy. Or course I would like to see that, but it is a philosophical book, if it would be really understood by at least one other person that would be good enough.
Here is why: Long ago Socrates said that Olympian gods probably do not exist. His contemporaries were outrages by this transgression against then prevailing common sense, which probably was at least one of the reasons for his bitter end. Nowadays we know that Socrates was right but did this knowledge let humanity in general to advance to levels of greater metaphysical understanding of the world? Since there are just different gods nowadays and atheism is still not universal, hardly so. And if this simple truth of Socrates are still not widely accepted despite being around for so long then what level of intelligence is required for something of complexity of Thus Spoke Zarathustra, So when at least someone understands philosophy it is good enough.
Every good philosophical book, is, among other things, a challenge to the intelligence of a reader that only reveals its secrets to the smartest. And not because philosophers are such a snob even though snobbism is common among us, but since philosophy is a hard subject like Theoretical Physics or Mathematical Analysis that can't be dumbed down without losing too much of essence. After all how widely Nietzsche is understood, for example people know he said that god is dead, but how many know what he meant by god? And that not all there is.
No comments:
Post a Comment