Evil Side of Good, Good Side of Evil

 

Many people like to divide the world into good and evil. A slightly wiser one however caution, that it's not that simple. They say phrases like there is kindness in the malice and malice in kindness or good intentions pave way to hell. I myself brought many examples of how evil intentions sometimes lead to good outcomes have while good similarly have evil consequences. Sometimes these paradoxical outcomes are intentional calculated moves, other times consequences come completely unintentionally.

You can use the Inyang symbol to illustrate that. It was originally designed for a different idea, but it fits here as well. The while circle in the black fields is good that comes from evil and black circle in while field is evil that comes from good.

Sure, not all evil cause any good. Similarly, some good is pure good and have no evil consequences. Also, your personal values determine what you see as evil or good. However, a lot of things in the world are more complex than that. I will focus on such cases in this article.

This is all the more relevant now, when evil wears mask of morality and disguises its evil agenda with moral, social justice and other such "good" words. In times like these the good has to wear cape of Robin Hood and strike evil from the shadows.

I my personal life I often found moral and things people call right to be harmful to me personally. Similarly, many bad things ended up liberating and enjoyable.

My parents were very eager to preach moral and principles but much less eager to actually walk the talk. The moral they preached was very self-serving too. They will go in length about how children owe their parents the world for raising them while conveniently stay nothing of parent's obligations towards their children. Can you call something like that a moral or some sort of universal standard of behavior? Of course not, it's just a hypocritical and self-serving brainwashing that benefit those who came up with.

There are many more good things like these, that are equally self-serving and harmful to those who listen to them. Take for example another "moral" idea that laziness is bad and those who do not work are bad people. In a world of high unemployment and poor work conditions we live now, this principle make life worse by forcing people to work under exploitative working conditions. This works for evil exploitative employers by entrenching their worst practices, while actively harming employees by forcing them to accept the ever-worsening working conditions. Without this "moral" principle one can just willfully quit and boycott work until you are offered better conditions. However, for too many that is not an option not only from financial but also from conscience side of things. For so long as these contentious people keep taking bad job offers, employers will not need to up their game and offer better working conditions that could actually improve life for those who work.

It's the same with feminism. This idea that ostensively seeks to protect women, actually destroys relationships and makes intergender interaction unpleasant. Men have expectations from relationships and from their gfs and wifes to meet these expectations. If feminism liberates women from needing to meet these expectations, then men no longer have any reasons to seek relationships. That is how women liberation leads to a society of singles where half of people never were and never will be in a relationship.

Finally, the current obsession with gym, strength and toughness is another thing that leads towards a lot of unnecessary pain and makes world much uglier that it should be. You can excuse many abuses when you claim it makes people tougher. Claiming it makes people stronger or tougher is like a Nazi enabling act and worst abuses and offenses of our society are perpetrated with these words on the lips. I can easily see my own parents supporting this toughness trend, justifying it with their self-serving moral. They were always the type to use moral to hide their cruelty. Even out Governor-General, Sam Mostyn, supports this toughness mantra, excusing abuses country wide. It's a shame she was appointed to that role. Her removal from her previous role in consul of female empowerment (or something similarly feminist) is certainly a pleasant thing.

There is more, but I will leave it at that.

On the other hand, some things that people call evil can lead towards good outcome.

In my own life my friends often helped me to break rules without getting caught. That allowed me to do a lot of fun things that adults around me wished to keep away from me. We would skip certain boring and unnecessary classes to play videogames of just chill out. My parents were against me drinking any alcohol, but my friends will teach me how to make sure they will never find out I had a beer or two. 

My friends were never the types to follow moral or rules. They were the types to know how to bend rules to get what you want without getting punished for breaking rules. Thanks to them I had more in life that I otherwise would, as my parents were notoriously stingy and restrictive.

There are other examples too. For example, internet piracy. Reviled by record artists associations for "stealing" their music, internet pirates distributed digital content around the net so that more people can enjoy music, movies and video games. According to corporate lawyers it violates copyright and deprive their companies of their rightful income. In reality those who would pay for music do so already and those who rely on pirates either too poor to pay and will not pay anyway and use free alternatives just to spite the corpos. To make matters worse, corporations sometimes put DRM and other measures that add unnecessary impediments to using their products, pirates could help users by removing such things.

Thus, internet pirates are like Prometheus to bring god's fire to common people but get occasionally tortured by the eagles of copyright law. I am glad to see that gradually internet pirates grew to get recognition for their efforts from people and now even run political parties, get elected and even run government departments in Czech Republic. I wish pirate parties will do better in other countries and especially in Australia. 

I mentioned that before, but WWII and Nazis, an event drenched in infamy, actually paved way for two happy decades that followed the war. Population surplus has died in war and those who left had good working conditions and life in general. 50s and 60s had one of the highest standards of living. Our living standards are falling because there were no major wars of pandemics, resulting in hundreds of millions of dead, since WWII. Remember how good life was during COVID-19 Pandemic? If virus was allowed to spread that would have continued and by now, we would have lived as kings. However, COVID-19 was stopped, and we are now even worse than we were before the COVID-19.

There is historical precedent too. Middle Ages were marked by backwardness, poverty and miserable unsanitary living conditions. That all ended with advent of bubonic plague or Black Death. Black Death shrank the population in half, giving one half peace of death and the other half a much more livable and dignified living condition. Thanks to the Black Death we later had Renaissance and other such good things that dramatically improved life and gave us the level of technological development we have now. Without it the medieval slave like feudal misery would likely have continued all the way to these days. 

Nowadays we desperately need another Black Death to end our current misery and elevate us to the higher plane of existence with much higher standards of living and human development. Otherwise, a rat-like survival existence will continue.

Finally Universal Basic Income. The idea is reviled by moralists as too expensive, immoral money for nothing that enable laziness and will prevent people from working. These are not the rational arguments, however. They are moralistic mumbo-jumbo, that forces increasing number of people into poverty, homelessness, suicide, crime and worse. So long as these moralists stand in the way of solutions, life will continue to get worse and worse. We need basic income to regain human dignity and end depravity and exploitation.

As I described above, very often good moral facade has wicked evil interior, while people reviled by moralists, actually bring good to people around them. Good, moral and right intentions lead towards poverty and misery. Bad intentions bring, solutions and prosperity. It is not always so but often is. 

That is why I often skeptical of people speaking of moral and doing right. That is also why I am inclined to support outside of the box solutions for our current problems. If moralists call it bad, then it must be good. It works much more often than it does not. 

White is often associated with good, but white flag is s flag of surrender. Those who offer it to you do not have anything good to offer. All they have is slavery and perpetual servitude to them. 

So, rally behind the Black Flag of opposition to the BS, privileged cunts try to sell. These cunts will call you evil but know that you are on the right side of history. New ideas always come in sin only to become new normal after they win. So, if older people call you sinner, immoral, evil and the like, then you are on the right track.

Differences between American and European Attitudes Towards Women

After thinking some more about what songs Americans and Europeans like or not, I noticed one overreaching theme. 

Many American songs that do not do well in Europe are about things that women want. Songs like It's Raining Men are basically female fantasy about men. Other songs talk about what women want from a man. Meanwhile songs that sang by men are often about how hard it is to please women or generally praising and admiring women. Somehow there are hardly any songs where its woman who has to struggle to please a man, or a man singing about a woman they want. As if it's not up to men to choose what they want from a woman. Also, many American female singers are fat, but hardly any male ones are. Double standards?

That leads towards the dynamic where men struggle to appeal to women and women decide who is worthy or not. I am not an American and have not been there to tell if that is how relationships dynamics work there, or not. Of course, it could also be the other way around and songs instead provide escape from reality for women who cannot get what they want.

Meanwhile in Europe on the other hand all about making women as pleasing to men as possible. Pretty bodies, no fat chicks and lyrics about willingness to please men. Women sing how they are willing to do anything for a man or sometimes how they regret failing and being dumped. Men instead sing about various things not related to love or relationship. European men never worry about pleasing women, its women job to worry about pleasing men. Women who beg and struggle to appeal to men and men choose who they fancy or not. In Europe men own relationships and women have to accommodate men.

That of course leads towards the opposite relationship dynamic. Men decide who is worthy or not. Women worry and struggle hard to be chosen while dread about being rejected. Europe is big and such things can vary from country to country, but overall, it is how it is. Even in Russia women worried about men choosing them, not if he is good enough or not. Picking men or expecting something of them is not a luxury they can afford. That said in Russia they get much more toxic after marriage, thinking its job done and from there on they can freeride.

To give an example of what I mean, compare say a song by Maroon 5 to the one by ABBA. In Maroon 5 song the guy complains how hard it is to please women but willing to do it anyway. In ABBA song it is a woman who is willing to try her best pleasing a man. This two give good contrast, but other songs broadly follow the same pattern.

This not-so-subtle difference in music possibly exposes a rather glaring difference in how relationship work on different side of the Atlantic. In Europe man is King and in the US he is servant instead. Of course, each individual relationship can vary, but that is what I can tell from my vantage point. 

Landlords are a Problem that Destroys Our Society

The so called free speech friendly X(twitter) have banned me for posting my opinion about landlords, here I post it again:

landlords and REAs should be gilliotined like French nobles of the Ancient regime, landlords are much worse parasites than French nobles ever were

Here is a link to an article that explains why landlords are a problem. We need a second French Revolution to end landlords this time.

I Hate People, Particularly Obnoxious People

 

I often go on and on about how I hate post-Financial Crisis of 2008 era of Austerity. I cite many reasons why. While many problems in our current life are due to this Crisis and I cannot wait until new trends will emerge and paint over the current shit and send Austerity Era mentality to the ash-heap of history.

Among other things I also complain how post Crisis trends made people worse than they used to be before the crisis. I wrote so much about how women were much better in the past and should stop following modern feminist trends in fashion and behavior. 

However not all the problems emerged from the crisis. Even before crisis there were certain types of cunts that would annoy me and ruin my life on regular basis. To think of it while they are few in numbers, the problems they are causing are clearly disproportional to their percentage of demographic.

One cunt among the classmates can make school experience insufferable. I had just one kind of enemy in high school, and he made my school life insufferable. Figuring out ways to never interact with him was most important part of my school life.

To make matters worse this cunt was able to turn my other classmates against me. Couple guys with whom I could reasonably interact with when this cunt was not around, would immediately turn into assistant cunts the moment he shows up. 

One major advantage of my high school friend Fedya is that he had more social clot than that cunt and could silence him in social situations and prevent him from harassing me. I often stayed close to Fedya to keep the cunt, named Vshyviy, away from me. If not Fedya, then I would walk away somewhere far and stay there.

Looking back at it now, I think that reflects reality of human interaction. Most people are alright; they just mind their business and do not cause any problems. Yet there is a peculiar type of a person, who has nothing better to do but ruin lives of others. They are both obnoxious and compulsive, they stalk others in order to make their lives hell.

It is not even about being selfish, far from it. People like this neglect their own comfort and convenience to ruin lives of others. They will get out of their way to harass you. They will take or make any excuse to talk to someone who does not want their company. 

When people like that see a sleeping person, they do not leave in order to not disturb them but instead approach and wake them up, often deliberately. That alone proves in my eyes that they are evil incarnates that must be purged from the face of the earth.

There is no good way of stopping them either as they seem enjoy what is going on even if you fight back. Because for them it is not a painful annoyance like it is for you, but an opportunity of social interaction. The only way to deal with them is to go somewhere far where they cannot see you and you cannot hear them.

Possibly they are the kind of parasitic extroverts who will engage in social interaction even if it annoys others. They are bane for an introverted person, not in the least because some of them even fail to understand they cause problem. (Picture above only partly related, but I could not find any better).

This kind of people is why I prefer to stay alone and often avoid people altogether. Best people I personally interacted with were all quiet introverted types, unpopular and often ignored by classmates and teachers alike. Fedya was partially an exception. People who were center of attention and whom everyone knew never interested me. Certain quiet people had nice and interesting things to tell me. 

However, they are interesting precisely because they have something else to do beside social interaction. The more introverted the person is, the nicer they typically are. Most extroverts who like social interaction are all annoying cunts.

That does produce a problem. All people who are worth interacting with are all sitting at home, enjoying their hobbies. Even if they are out on the streets they remain as discreet as possible and try to get back to the comfort of their homes.

In contrast all the obnoxious people who are worthless cunts are constantly out there looking to talk to someone or just annoy everyone with their constant loud presence.

Extroverted people are like weed; as weed drive useful crops extinct, extroverts drive better people away with their annoying behavior. Now all good people are hiding in corners while annoying cunts parade in the middle of streets and walkways. This is bad for society as a whole as worse people displace better people. Something has to be done about it to reverse it. A genocide of extroverted people and Capricorns would be a desirable solution for me personally. Extroverts violate King's Peace and that is an offence in our monarchy. I hope police will look into that.

As for less radical solutions, then a way for introverts to interact with each other without extroverts' presence is needed.

One way to avoid extroverts in the past were online forums. However eventually internet became more popular and now extroverts are all over the net, making life of introverts annoying. Online interaction back early 2000s were much better than what it is now.

Now that I think of it, I hate this post-crisis era because it let extroverts loose on the world. Social boundaries and respect towards individuals have eroded, and it became possible to annoy people around with obnoxious loud behavior. Contemporary "so called" culture too cater for extroverts tastes only. Most music is brain dead rap or primitive pop, only my own collection is different and does not contain these two types of "music". I hate contemporary fashion, children and ugly women and gyms: fashion is ugly and disgusting, children are loud and annoying, obese women and muscle brain men are everywhere, finally there are obnoxious Jesus-mongers who try to sell you their mumbo-jumbo about "god". All of that disgusts me the moment I see it. 

What happen to actually cute women? Are they all sit home and fap to gelbooru? Did ugly, fat women scare them away?

I hate extroverts and I hate the extroverted world they created out of post-crisis situation. I hope it will all go away and world will re-orient itself towards introverts again. 

Truth About Pirates

 

I often cite CGPGrey videos about various topics, including the one about piracy. 

While pirate video is rather relevant to the times we live in now and issues we face, its actually very inaccurate about realities of Golden Age of Piracy. So, I decided to write here about actual history of piracy.

To begin with a little bit of background. Spanish and Portuguese were first to discover and colonize new world. Treaty of Tordesillas divided it among themselves precisely to avoid information leaking to other kingdoms of Europe. Thus, by the time French and English found out about Americas, Spanish already hogged up and garrisoned pretty much everything of value with only few small barren islands in the Caribbean remaining unclaimed.

To make matters worse, Spanish found a lot of silver in the area and begun mining it. Seeing how Spanish ship all that silver in loaded to the brim galleons, got Frech and English really upset with envy. However soon they figured out a simple solution to this problem, just steal the silver. After all trip from Maracaibo in Spanish Main to Sevilla in Spain is long and perilous, and Spanish shipped their silver completely unguarded, so if it will get lost to pirates they will not even find out when and how. Thus, piracy was born.

First pirates were probably members of French and English navy, who hoisted the black flag to avoid getting their kingdoms entangled if something went wrong. The money they made from captured Spanish silver was so huge, soon everyone started doing it and piracy boom begun.

The amounts of silver, Spanish shipped was so huge, French and English navies soon found themselves short of personnel and ships, so they began recruiting volunteers, private captains with ships and crews. Soon private crews started plunder Spanish shipping on the high seas. These privateers (or corsairs in French terminology) came from all walks of life and were actively encourage and supported by French and English governments.

To give privateers assurances of support and at the same time entitle government to the fraction of what they could plunder, French and English issued so called "letters of marque and reprisal". These papers could make anyone a sort of "private" member of the navy, thus in theory guaranteeing them protection of French or English crown as well as entitle them to be treated as prisoners of war in the event of capture by the Spanish. Most importantly however they allowed them to access to ports of the issuing country. When in some peace treaties you see phrase "prohibit unrestricted issue of letter of marque and reprisal", it is about this practice.

French issued these letters to pretty much anyone with a ship and a crew without asking it how they obtained ship or the money. That is how French colony of Tortuga became known as pirate haven. Colony economy consisted entirely of taxing the booty, these privateers would bring.

English instead prefer their own traders. Back then it was possible to form fully legal joint stock company for the purpose of pirating. Such company could openly sell its stock on London stock exchange to raise money to buy a ship, hire crew and then go to the new world to plunder on high seas.

From legal perspective this privateering was considered capturing prizes of war and legal documents refer to it in such terms. Letters of marque were legal vehicle that allowed law to treat piracy as legitimate combat. That is how famous pirates, like Sir Francis Drake got their knighthood and other forms for recognition from government.

Eventually however Spanish got a gist of what is going on and threatened France and England with war if they do not stop this piracy. Unfortunately for Spanish, profits from piracy were so huge, French and English would rather stay in perpetual war than stop the plunder.

Thus, Golden age of Piracy truly begun. All sorts of ships and crews would steal Spanish silver and then turn it over to French or English on Tortuga or Jamaica, who offered them full support, assistance in repair and resupply and so on.

On their end Spanish refused to recognise letters or marque as legitimate prove of military status, threatening pirates with noose if they got caught. They also ramped up security of their treasure fleets, making it harder to for pirates to plunder them. 

Finally Spanish eventually found out where pirate friendly French and English ports in the new world were located and sent their armada to level both Port Royal and Tortuga to the ground. That did not stop the piracy however as when Spanish left, French and English simply came back and rebuild.

This is how majority of all pirate crews operated. Sure, there were occasional rouges who attacked everyone and port in wilderness, but these were rare. They make for a good story, but not for a good career option, as rouge pirates would pretty much always end up caught by one or other side and executed.

On the other hand, privateering was a way to riches and even social advancement. It was a business that people who counted money for living would invest into. Yes, there was risk that Spanish will capture you, but back then risk of perishing in a storm was likely higher.

Plunder-fest would occasionally come to a pause when French or English needed an alliance with Spanish for some war in Europe. On such occasion governors of Tortuga and Port Royal will instruct privateers to halt attacks on Spanish. Pirates would temporarily turn to other activities such as cutting wood in Belize. However, once that war will be over, the pirating will resume.

The definitive end of Golden Age of Piracy unexpectedly also came from Europe. War of Spanish Succession eventually placed French Bourbons on the throne in Spain. That turned France from enemy into a friend of Spain. 

Not willing to further damage now friendly Spain, France begun cracking down on piracy. Near overnight Tortuga turned from pirate heaven into a hostile port.

Pirates fought back and re-established themselves in New Providence on Bahamas. This time they were actually independent and unaffiliated with any power. Their settlement flew black flag. However, that was short lived.

England did not want to be at war with both France and Spain to continue the plunder. England also found new way of making money in the new world, running sugar and cotton plantations, using West African slave labor. Finally French likely offered them something like share of profits from Spanish treasure fleets, if they turn on pirates.

Times were changing and safety of shipping routes were more important that theoretical booty from occasional daring raid. 

All that sealed fate of piracy in the Caribbean. Eventually, now cozy and friendly with each other, the three kingdoms went on to destroy New Providence. England later colonised it to deny pirates any free land to base themselves on. Age of Piracy came to an end only to be remembered in fiction.

Difference between Behaving Modestly and Dressing Modestly

Recently there began a trend towards wearing grandma style clothes and hair among women. That is probably a response to criticism that girls became too slutty and immodest. However, grandma style clothes are not the solution to the problem, especially if it's a behavioural problem. 

There is a difference between dressing modestly and behaving modestly. One can dress modestly but behave immodest. Take for example Ada from Black Lagoon, she wears nun's habit but acts like your average bar hopping, booze drinking street girl.

It is also possible to dress immodestly but act modestly. Examples are all over the place, as anime industry generally works to create such girls on industrial mass production scale. However, to illustrate the point, take Shino from .hack/Roots. She wears stockings with exposed garters and upper tights (zettai ryōiki) but behaves very humbly and modestly.

If you needed any more hints as to which type men prefer, then I will just give the answer, it's the latter. Girls should dress pretty and sexy but behave modestly and humbly. It's the Japanese manners, not body shape or even clothes (though kimono has certain appeal too) that are so attractive to men. Japanese girls are taught to behave modestly, and they do. Western girls should learn to behave Japanese and not dress grandma.

How Boomer Popular Culture Ruined Women

 

Back in my teens I liked music videos like these. I was annoyed by stuffy rules my parents and school were imposing on me and wanted to get away from it all. Here in these videos girls ditch annoying school for a road trip and a beach. I too wished I could just ditch school and parents and spend the rest of my life in on Antalya beaches. The best memories of my early life all come from resort hotels and towns, a happy break from a dreary school with its bulling classmates and pressing obligations.

Couple of dozen years later, looking at these videos now as an adult, I noticed something I used to overlook in the past. No, I did not change my mind about school or resort hotels. 5 star resort hotels are the best thing in the world and school I wish I could forget. 

Just to clarify education in Australia was a mixed bag experience, fresh from Russia I mostly liked study in Australia. Looking back at it now, I can see flaws here as well. Flaws compare to how it could be, not compare to education in Russia.

 

In contrast education in Russia is pretty much all bad with no redeeming qualities. People who say Russian education is best, are blinded by patriotism morons who do not know jack shit. Studying in Australia only made it more apparent who most of what Russian 'education' make students do is utterly pointless waste of time. 

On top of that there is also bulling and other unpleasant interactions with classmates. There is no bulling problem in Australia, at least I did not experienced bulling in Australia. Only in Russia schools utterly fail to do anything problem students bulling classmates.

However back to original topic. The problem with these videos, that I noticed many years later, is gender relationships and female behavior in general. Back in the days I did not look at it from sexual perspective, so fresh look exposed this problem. Aerosmith particularly likes to make music videos like these. Other musicians of the era do it too but the way Aerosmith depict such things make it more obvious than others. 

Aerosmith members are all early boomers by age so you can their music boomer music. Even younger musicians can sometimes be considered part of boomer pop culture, as it is likely boomers who control who get to be signed to record labels and promoted and who does not.

The problem is that girls in these videos could get away with anything. It is always girls who do various things and men in these videos either accept it or downright encourage it.

Such wild unhinged and uncontrollable females is not something any reasonable man would want to date, much less marry. Maybe boomers liked girls like these, but Millennials do not.

I am not criticizing these videos because of nudity, exposed bras and so on. I personally like porn and do not see problems with sexualizing and objectifying female body.

What I am talking about girls should not be proactive or initiative in a relationship. This video gets gender relationships backward. 

Girls should dress pretty but behave like a weak fragile flower that has no agency or control over its life. Feminists decry the fact that "men objectify women". However, for a woman to look attractive in male eyes, she has to be objectifiable. She has to look more like an inanimate object that can simply be claimed and used as man sees fit rather than a person with its own emotions and desires. These videos make women to behave exact opposite of that.

I like Maledom BDSM precisely because it allows to make women more of an object using BDSM gear. Gagged, blindfolded and well restrained women getting infinitely closer towards the objectifiable ideal women than without these things.

However, BDSM alone cannot do it. Women have to show predisposition towards being tied up and controlled by a man. It should be easy to picture her sitting there quietly in chains and restrains. Good woman is someone who does not and cannot control her life and lets man control her instead. Her fate is not in her own hands, but in my hands alone. That is how I like women.